In its defense, Google contended that its partnerships help phones that run on the Android operating system better compete against smartphone market rival Apple’s iPhone. Lawyer Paul Swanson, a partner at Holland & Hart who specialises in technology and antitrust law, said “a sweeping verdict like this is going to be hard for Google to undo in post-trial proceedings or on appeal.”Įpic sued Google three years ago, claiming the tech company monopolised the Android app distribution market for more than a decade by striking side deals with rivals and using its resources to thwart competition. This verdict just knocked a big hole in the garden wall.” “That is one of the things that has kept the internet market so concentrated. “The last two decades have seen a profound shift away from the open internet towards walled gardens,” he said. Stanford University law professor Mark Lemley said the verdict “has the potential to be a very big deal - not just for Epic, which will get the ability to sell directly on Android phones - but for the entire internet.” He quickly hailed the ruling in a post on social network X. Tim Sweeney, chief executive officer of Epic, flashed a slight smile as he sat in the front row of the public seating area of the courtroom after the verdict was read out. “The trial made clear that we compete fiercely with Apple and its App Store, as well as app stores on Android devices and gaming consoles.” “Android and Google Play provide more choice and openness than any other major mobile platform,” said Wilson White, Google’s vice president of Government Affairs and Public Policy. Google, whose shares slipped 0.4% in extended trading, said it plans to challenge the verdict. Quaker onboards Kiara Advani and Sidharth Malhotra as brand ambassadors
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |